FCC EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

2415 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-21#26110082801 · Permanent link ↗

In 2019 I facilitated the passage, in Oregon, of SB283 which was to review science to determine whether c…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
In 2019 I facilitated the passage, in Oregon, of SB283 which was to review science to determine whether children in schools are safe being exposed to high power wi-fi routers and other wireless devices in the classroom. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate and overwhelmingly in the House. While lobbying the bill and gathering information I interviewed 2 children who had to leave school due to microwave sickness caused by RF in the school. I also met 2 teachers, one in Los Angeles with the same condition. The teacher in L.A. sued the school and won the lawsuit. The results of the science review by the Oregon Health Authority, quoting the first draft: "All studies showed worse health outcomes, all studies showed harm to reproductive organs..." The draft was withheld from a FOIA request and later obtained by journalist, Dan Forbes, who wrote a lengthy article about the corrupt handling and the crime committed by OHA in withholding from a FOIA request. In addition, commercial insurance companies will no longer insure for "harm from exposure to electromagnetic frequencies" This is an industry wide practice that has taken affect years ago. Cell telephone advertising shows people with the phone against their heads yet companies warn to keep the phone an inch from the body. I always wonder if legislators or others in high profile agencies and organizations that are compromised by industry money ever consider they are doing harm by defrauding science, writing phony reports, and controlling the narrative in deceiving the public that they are safe. You have blood on your hands, perhaps accessory to murder and should be protecting the public rather than corporate profits
Posted 2026-10-21#26110082800 · Permanent link ↗

I believe that it is time to seriously address the negative effects of 5G radiation on human health, espe…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I believe that it is time to seriously address the negative effects of 5G radiation on human health, especially that of children. I will cite two scientific studies, of many, that describe the deleterious effects of 5G radiation. Any reasonable conclusion would be that to continue to use this format for our basic internet communications would require adequate shielding from the radiation. Without that, we are risking our future - and not just of homo sapiens. Please look at the depth and breadth of studies of this subject. It will not just 'go away' because powerful interests say it's absolutely necessary. We know that is not true. Thank you for your consideration of my comments and the research papers I cited separately.
Posted 2026-10-21#26110082799 · Permanent link ↗

PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET Docket No. 13-84 Submitted by: Direct Energy W…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET Docket No. 13-84 Submitted by: Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc. Date: October 20, 2026** 1. Introduction Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc. sincerely thanks the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for inviting public participation in its review of radiofrequency (RF) exposure standards, testing procedures, and potential health effects. Incorporated in 2021, our organization provides advocacy, education, and incident-documentation services for civilians reporting unexplained physical and neurological symptoms they believe may involve directed-energy, radiofrequency, electromagnetic, or acoustic energy exposure or assault. We support technological innovation while believing that public safety protections must advance alongside wireless technology. 2. Our Experience Our organization began receiving civilian incident reports because people repeatedly told us they could not find an agency willing to document their experiences. We could not stand by while Americans were suffering and feeling that their country did not care. Despite limited resources and no permanent physical investigation facility, we established procedures to receive complaints, conduct case reviews, and prepare incident reports. Approximately 1,000 civilians throughout the United States have submitted incident reports to our organization. Complainants describe unexplained pain, burning sensations, vibrations, pressure, sleep disturbances, unusual sounds, and other physical and neurological symptoms. Complainants stated in their reports that they have no mental health conditions and that their injuries are often misdiagnosed. Some believe remotely operated, wall-penetrating energy technologies are responsible for their experiences. Others report electronic intrusion, unwanted communications, and possible technology-assisted harassment. These reports do not independently establish RF exposure, identify particular devices, or confirm the cause of symptoms. However, they highlight concerns deserving appropriate scientific and medical evaluation. We have contacted federal security and investigative agencies requesting assistance with these reports but have not received a substantive response. 3. RF Exposure Standards and Testing We encourage the FCC to carefully review whether existing RF exposure limits and testing procedures adequately address today's wireless environment. This includes widespread mobile-device use, multiple sources of RF exposure, emerging wireless technologies, and potential health effects associated with long-term exposure. Special consideration should be given to children, who may experience many years of wireless technology use beginning at an early age. We encourage the FCC to examine reliable scientific research concerning possible non-cancer health effects and determine whether existing testing procedures adequately protect the public. We ask that conclusions be based on reproducible scientific evidence, with clear explanations of the strengths and limitations of available research. 4. Public Safety and Consumer Protection The advancement of wireless communications makes public safety, accountability, and consumer protection increasingly important. We encourage clear federal guidance on RF exposure standards, compliance requirements, and safe wireless-device operation. Our organization has also received reports from civilians who describe hearing external sounds, voices, or communications without being able to identify their direction or source. Directional speakers and Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs) demonstrate that sound can be projected toward particular areas or listeners over distances. These reports do not establish that acoustic devices caused the experiences described. However, they raise concerns about the need for appropriate technical and medical evaluations. An unexplained auditory experience should not automatically be classified as either a mental health condition or evidence of technological harassment. We encourage appropriate federal agencies to examine safeguards against the intentional misuse of acoustic technologies to threaten, intimidate, or harm men, women, or children. 5. Recommendations We respectfully request that the FCC: 1. Review existing RF exposure limits and portable-device testing procedures using reliable scientific evidence. 2. Evaluate scientific findings concerning potential non-cancer health effects and long-term RF exposure, particularly involving children. 3. Consider whether current testing procedures adequately reflect widespread wireless-device use and technological advancements. 4. Strengthen public education concerning RF exposure standards, regulatory compliance, and consumer protection. 5. Coordinate with HHS and appropriate federal agencies regarding RF exposure research, public health concerns, and safety standards. 6. Provide clear procedures for reporting suspected violations of FCC regulations and referring matters outside the Commission's authority to appropriate agencies. 6. Closing Statement The United States is a world leader in wireless technology. We believe it should also lead in public safety, responsible regulation, and consumer protection. People are asking for answers. They deserve credible scientific information, appropriate medical attention, and meaningful consideration of their reported experiences. We encourage the federal government to examine whether existing criminal laws adequately address the intentional misuse of emerging technologies to harm, threaten, or harass individuals. DEW Agency welcomes opportunities to collaborate with appropriate federal agencies and provide civilian triage services, including receiving complaints, documenting incidents, identifying urgent needs, and referring individuals to qualified authorities. We respectfully request consideration of our organization's experience and willingness to assist with civilian reporting and referral efforts. Thank you for this opportunity to contribute to an important national public safety discussion. Respectfully submitted, Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc Ms. Mechael Wright-Hodges, Founder and Executive Director Website: www.DEWAgency.org Telephone: 781-561-8753 Email: info@dewagency.org
Posted 2026-10-21#26110082798 · Permanent link ↗

Attachment-only filing · Sarah Howard

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Official attachments · 5

Opens the original FCC-hosted document. Document contents are not included in topic matching.

Posted 2026-10-21#26110082796 · Permanent link ↗

Attachment-only filing · Patricia McGrath

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Official attachments · 2

Opens the original FCC-hosted document. Document contents are not included in topic matching.

Posted 2026-10-21#26110082795 · Permanent link ↗

Attachment-only filing · Caroline Dixon

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Official attachments · 1

Opens the original FCC-hosted document. Document contents are not included in topic matching.

Posted 2026-10-21#26110082794 · Permanent link ↗

About 10 years ago Penelec wanted to install a "smart meter" on our house. I was aware that these EMF dev…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
About 10 years ago Penelec wanted to install a "smart meter" on our house. I was aware that these EMF devices had been known to be detrimental to the health of people with pacemakers. As my father had this device, we had to hire a lawyer to try to stop the installation. This cost tens of thousands of dollars. After two months my father said it was costing too much. Shortly thereafter Penelec installed said meter while we were not at home. Exactly one month after installation my father had a stroke, resulting in his need for a wheelchair for the remainder of his life. These instruments need to be removed from every home.
Posted 2026-10-21#26110082792 · Permanent link ↗

Attachment-only filing · Frog Safe, Inc.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Official attachments · 4

Opens the original FCC-hosted document. Document contents are not included in topic matching.

Posted 2026-10-21#26110082791 · Permanent link ↗

Attachment-only filing · Claudia MacD

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Official attachments · 2

Opens the original FCC-hosted document. Document contents are not included in topic matching.

Posted 2026-10-21#26110082789 · Permanent link ↗

I hereby object to the Federal Communications Commission’s continued reliance on RF radiation exposure li…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I hereby object to the Federal Communications Commission’s continued reliance on RF radiation exposure limits that have not been adequately updated to reflect current scientific evidence, modern wireless technologies, cumulative and long-term exposure, and the potential for non-thermal biological effects. The public deserves safety standards based on current, independent scientific research, transparent risk assessment, and the precautionary consideration of potential harm to human health. Regulatory standards must be periodically reassessed as new evidence emerges, rather than presumed adequate simply because they were adopted decades ago. I respectfully request that this objection be entered into the official record and that the FCC undertake a comprehensive, independent review of its RF radiation exposure standards, including their scientific basis, adequacy for contemporary technologies, and protection of residents, workers, and other potentially exposed populations. From my personal experience: I have been overexposed to EMF and RF radiation from unpermitted 5G wireless base station installed right above our living quarters. This cluster of transmitters were operated under FCC Experimental Radio License utilizing untested, unauthorized prototype equipment without any prior testing for RF/EMF emission compliance. Our family started to feel ill effects right after the activation of these devices and the symptoms got worst with each passing day. It got so bad that we ultimately had no other choice then to relocate to a new apartment to get away from this constant exposure. My mother now suffers from EHS and other symptoms which greatly affected quality of her life. Despite the many complaint we reported to FCC of the nature of the antennas, being used for experimentation and testing and the site not being registered and so forth, FCC's response was that the equipment is operating within the FCC limits even though they could not provide such verification themselves for such unregistered prototype. I urge you to update your safety standards based on recent studies provided to you by many scientist from all over the world so general public has a chance for better protection and that people do not have to go through similar experience of loosing their home or health. Sincerely, Phillip Kabilka

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.