All comment threads

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Letter to FCC re RF radiation. The current and greatly outdated standards for RF were and are completely inadequate. They are allowing and facilitating serious harm to humans, other animals and biological systems. See and read: https://bioinitiative.org/ I ask the FCC to do an adequate major reassessment of safety standards, organize and start this reassessment now - with all deliberate speed to begin it - with experts and scientists in the field who have no ties to the relevant industries and put new standards in place that are actually, scientifically and demonstratively protective of humans. A dear friend of mine was exposed to a cell tower when she moved into a friends house to house sit. Her friend had agreed to allow a cell tower be installed near her house in exchange for monthly payments for the placement. Until moving in, my friend had been an energetic, healthy person working as a gardener. She was so connected to nature. When I would take walks with her, it had been so wonderful as she exclaimed about the various birds and what the squirrels were doing, etc. When she moved in my friend could not understand what was happening to her, as she could barely get off the couch to get food. She could not get any relief. She could not figure out what was going on. As a result, she became so electrically sensitive that she was strongly negatively affected whenever she subsequently went in or near various places in the US where there was RF radiation near by. Now those threats are ubiquitous. She could not stand anyone having a cell phone on when we were driving in a car. She was negatively affected every time the drive brought us near to communication towers. She would say, she felt like she had to flee. I actually felt that one time and it was awful. I had gone into a Verizon store and immediately felt that feeling of needing to flee as she had described it. There was a cell tower on the roof of the Verizon store. I am so grateful that I never felt that again - it was awful and I never want to feel it again. Subsequently, my friend visited a friend in another State. At that friend’s house, she met Arthur Furstenberg who had become electrically sensitive in medical school. He subsequently did a deep dive into electrical sensitivity, wrote a book about it and started an organization. He recognized her electrically sensitive condition and explained it to her. She was found unconscious by a neighbor. She was taken to a hospital. She died there on January 13, 2019. She did not have any medical conditions. I have another friend who is also very electrically sensitive and has many of the same symptoms as the friend who died. They did not know each other, lived in different states and I never mentioned the other friend. They both described the very same sensations all over the top of their shoulders and backs. Like very weird and disturbing crawling electrical sensations. They both showed me the same location and described it in the same way. They were both paranoid that people were sending electrical sensations into their bodies. One said it was her husband sending bad, disturbing energy into her, the other said it was from next door neighbors sending similar bad electrical like sensations from pointing electrical emissions through the wall and sometimes from helicopters. This is/was a terrible situation for them to live with. As fellow humans, please do the studies and initiate protective standards and actions asap. Many, too many, people are suffering and children are at risk, especially due to their thinner skulls with the spreading of cell phone use among younger and younger children. https://bioinitiative.org/updated-research-summaries/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies Docket No. 13-84 COMMENTS OF Shirley Jackson Dated: October 22, 2026 Our youth are our future. FACT: By definition of the huge increase in EMF infrastructure during the Covid slow-down years, the exposure levels of children and pregnant mothers have skyrocketed especially since the EMF infrastructure deployment during the Covid shutdown years. FACT: the FCC has NOT completed its task to review the science pertinent to considering a change in Human Exposure Levels. On August 13, 2021, the federal district court ruled that the FCC had been arbitrary and capricious, i.e., did NOT do its job reviewing the huge number of public comments provided to them! As confirmed by email to FCC from then Environmental Health Trust's executive director Theodora Scaratto, there were no scheduled meetings calling for any of your "working groups" to properly analysis the science for indicators that a change in human exposure levels was warranted, no risk analysis. Why does this resistance to transparency and accountability go on and on; you wait 5 years (until after a major push-out of EMF infrastructure) to then say, "Oh we don't need any better regulatory guard rails or changes in human exposure limits." That makes about ten years of stalling so that corporations do not have to be accountable for a safe roll out. I love technology! I was a research project manager for the School District of Palm Beach County and I created a game-changing database that allowed us to detect when risk factors were showing up in a student's life. We designed programs for "Safe Schools" based on an astute reality of "what was happening." Decades ago, research was proposed linking various EMF exposures to people's ability to work or learn or to reproduce children. Back then the task of collecting data (time and specific device usage information) and then anonmously relating it to nationally detrimental risk factors (frequently now collected learning levels, work productivity, patterns of health challenges/absences, addiction rates/buying habits, car accidents, etc) was discounted as feasible. NOW, isn't that type of thing wireless companies do routinely? IT IS TIME THAT THE FCC STEP UP - to realizing that it CAN provide economic incentives and fair and equal access by realizing that there are sub-populations that SHOULD NOT be exposed to the current guidance. CONCLUSION Accordingly, I strongly urge the Commission to establish an expert working group – scientists and public health personnel to apply the priorities of citizen safety, to review the scientific evidence from the numerous studies conducted on this EMF human exposure topic and find that the current RF exposure limits are insufficient to protect public health and the environment. Change the basic premise that you cannot expect these exposures to be safe when they are based on only ONE device, instead of real-world usage…at least 25 devices, one per student in a single room. The exposure limits should be lowered to reflect the science previously disregarded by the Commission. Sincerely, Shirley Jackson Attached Study https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1915745/full

The Telecommunucations Act paralleled The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) signed into United States federal law signed into law on August 21, 1996, the FCC may be liable for data trafficking—especially given high-end corporate and small business users which are coerced into private electronic health records, of little import to the original substance to their electronic data securities, transfers! Also see HIGHTEC ACT, 2009. As well, since frequency ranges of small digital devices parallel DEW-frequency ranges, there is a seemingly deliberate phishing for terorrists. FCC could also experience blowback, for lackadaisical bandwidth wars. Scrutinize your DOD criminal codes, if FCC enmeshes mass with corporate markets. Finally, Public Health Emergencies of International Concern appears to underwrite model laws for universal model laws such as, for example, Arizona Title 36-543, Annual review of a patient with a grave (literally?), or persistent (shouldn’t the purported medication mitigate whatever target), or acute (-ly dehydrated! and shouldn’t UPC have already mitigated this level of concern?) disability.. notice.. court-order for continued treatment (inevitable?) ..rules (legal fiction does NOT apply to living beings)   ..immunity (from liability for iatrogenic cause of death) displays anticipatory rhetoric, reiterates a constructive and lucrative, fraud which gives rise to unlawful conversion of living beings to chattel for enslavement by willful international cohorts.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

I've been around computers and electronics since 1977, starting with mainframe computers and the old-fashioned tube displays. That was my job until 2003 when I retired. I'm always somebody who wants to try new things when they come out. At one time,I had three microwaves in my kitchen, or so I could cook three different items at the same time and have a full course meal come out in 30 minutes. When I started to work from home, I always asked for the fastest modem that was possible from my work. When the iPhone came out in 2007, I bought one and used it incessantly. I made the comment to myself “this may cause me problems later on, but I will deal with that then, because right now it is wonderful”. In 2012, I was living in my condo in Port Hueneme, California, called Surfside IV. I was on the second of three floors at the end of the building. In March, the electric company installed seven smart electric meters in the utility room that was directly underneath my master bedroom, underneath a closet. In May, for about two weeks, I noticed that whenever I walked back to the master bedroom, I tended to get a headache. My neighbor downstairs reported the same thing. I now believe this is when they were testing the smart meters. I was excited for them to be activated, so that I could monitor my electrical usage by the hour. Once a month I would call, asking when they were going to be fully activated. About three weeks into September, I called and was notified that they were activated at the beginning of September. Starting around the beginning of September, my sleep had gone from nine hours a day to 4 1/2 hours a day. I thought I just had a bad bout of insomnia. I had no idea that the smart meters had been turned on. I'm fairly smart, but with my lack of sleep, it took me a year to figure out what to do. I got four of the 7 smart meters replaced with manual ones. I replaced my wireless phones with wired, and I switched to Ethernet cords instead of wireless for my computer. This made a small improvement. The final step was to construct a Faraday cage, made out of aluminum screening that I constructed around my mattress on my platform bed, with one side opening up for me to get in and out, and the mattress inside. This reduced the reading on my meter to -65 DB. I then was able to sleep for 8 hours. At times, the cage would get tears in it and I found that if the reading went over -60 DB my sleep would deteriorate to six hours. This happened several times, so it was a multiple experiment that was corroborated. I found that if I was in an area that had -35 dB or greater, that within a half an hour, I would feel very nervous and my sleep would be affected that night. I found that being in meeting rooms with other people that had cell phones, even though there was Wi-Fi in the building, that if I had everybody turn their cell phones off, that the radiation was reduced by 90% most times. In other words, having cell phones on, in close proximity to me in a group, was much stronger than the Wi-Fi in the building. In a movie theater, I would have to go to a far corner, to be away from being in the middle of the group of people. In 2018 and in 2019, I was in the hospital for a total of 4 weeks . I had to be given drugs to help me get any sleep at all. In 2024 I was in the hospital for over three weeks. With opiates in me, I still had trouble sleeping more than two hours a night. I finally relented and let them give me Ambien, which allowed me to sleep six hours. I ordered an EMF blocking single pup tent that is designed to be used on motel beds. We installed that on my hospital bed and I was able to sleep six hours with no Ambien. In 2026, I was in the hospital again and used the same pup tent in both the emergency room and in the hospital, to good effect. I now find that I need to be in an area with no bars on my cell phone and no Wi-Fi hotspot around me to be able to sleep good. If I have electrical wires that are not metal shielded near my sleeping bed, my legs feel like I am being bit by small bugs. There are no bugs on my legs and no red marks indicating that I'm being bit. After shielding the wires or turning the circuit breaker off for them, the feeling goes away. If the building wires going near my bed are from circuits where neutrals have been shared or neutrals have been connected to ground, causing large magnetic fields to form, depending on the current flow, it will wake me up. In 2024 I collapsed with complete heart block, while traversing the spot in my bedroom that had high magnetic fields caused by not per code wiring. I had tried for several years to get the building inspector in the city, the HOA board, and the homeowners where the code violations seem to come from, to fix the code violation that had been identified by three different building biologist. I found that only about 1% of electricians are aware of this code violation, and that they regularly violate it because it saves them money and the building inspectors don't check for it. Human beings have a habit of enthusiastically adopting new technology. The new technology is sold and promoted by some individuals to make money. Therefore, they don't want anything to get in the way of enlarging their bank account. When DDT first came out, there was an advert in the 1947 issue of TIME magazine that said: "DDT is good for me". When automobiles first came out, it took decades before anybody put a seatbelt in them, even though anybody who knew physics, understood that that was an obvious cheap safety feature. The manufacturers did not want anyone to think, when they saw a car with a seatbelt, that maybe they might get hurt by using the car and therefore not buy it. This pattern is being repeated with wireless technology. DDT was banned, but we have made many improvements to make automobiles safer, as the benefits were worth the injuries and deaths that occurred. I believe the path that we took with automobiles, is the same one we need to take with wireless technology. I have read numerous scientific studies that indicate that children are much more affected negatively by wireless technology than adults. Children rely upon adults to guide them to live life safely. Are we implementing this technology in a way that minimizes the negative effects on children? Are we using the equivalent of booster seats, shoulder harnesses, and speed limits with wireless technology? Are we teaching the children how best to access the Internet with the minimum of wireless exposure? Are we giving parents hints on minimizing wireless exposure to their children? Certified electrical building biologists can help the FCC with this.