Thousands of peer-reviewed articles (https://bioinitiative.org/?sm_guid=MTA1NDMyOXw1OTY3NTg4OXwtMXx0ZHJlaWVyQGhvdG1haWwuY29tfDkwNzgyMTd8fDB8MHwzMzQ1NzQxNzR8MTA2MXwwfDB8fDE5NjY5ODJ8MA2) have shown that wireless radiation at levels allowed by the FCC can harm children, adults, plants, trees, birds and their migration, pets, wildlife, pollinators and other insects. The FCC must follow the D.C. Circuit Court's 2020 order in EHT v. FCC to address how wireless radiation affects children and the environment, the health implications of long-term exposure, and the increase in the vast number of devices and changes in technology since 1996.
I was living in Honolulu, HI when it opened as the first Iridium satellite gate and when the full system was activated. My health and quality of life was immediately affected. I can't sleep as well, think as well, and have had increasing health issues related to radiation exposures as the levels have increased since then. I have been diagnosed by an MD, under WHO codes, as having radiation and microwave sickness. I have had to move 4 or more times, pay to opt out of smart meters and to modify my home environment, and have lost access to public spaces. I have been forced to use cell phones while traveling, and now even for banking and government services, and have no phone at home options other than voice over internet, which is very poor quality. The more the wireless in integrated into public utilities and public spaces the sicker I have become and been forced to restrict my travel and social life. It has made me functionally disabled with no place of safe shelter and no way to communicate normally and at great financial cost. I don't need or want wireless radiation in consumer products, and I don't want highly conductive nanoparticles or semi-conductive materials in my food, medicine, clothing and household appliances and products, because it increases my sensitivity. If putting wireless objects against or near your body is not advised by manufacturers and doctors, why would anyone want to put wireless objects inside your body? Making a hand held cell phone that can't work without contact to your hand is a health hazard, and a terrible design for communication devices. I have telephone jacks in my recently built home that are now useless and the replacements are much more expensive. I don't want pulsed microwave radiation running through the wiring in my home. How about adapting the technology to people and not forcing people to pay for and adapt to new technology that only benefits the really big plans of the military and corporations that should not be involved in human eugenics or in transforming the planet into a wireless AI system.
There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.
There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.
5G technology has not been sufficiently tested to assure no damage to live systems. Therefore, please extend maximum regulations, in order to protect us. Thank you.
I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public, a Dual USA and Canadian citizen, and as one who is negatively affected by man-made electromagnetic radiation. I personally suffer from tinnitus and severe vertigo. When I was living in a city with smart meters, cell towers, neighbors wi-fi, etc. my symptoms were becoming more severe as time went by. About 2 years, ago we moved to an acreage where the emf levels are low the great majority of the time and since we have moved here I have not had any more vertigo attacks. In my opinion, man-made electromagnetic radiation is the latest, greatest environmental pollutant and it has become ubiquitous in our present world. Many people as well as all life in the environment is negatively affected, as we have evolved to function in the natural electromagnetic environment. I support the FCC taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge the FCC to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.