Dear Sir or Madame, It is imperative we, as humans, take care to put an immediate halt to the frenzied build-out of the current wireless and EMF related infrastructure. Updated information has not been provided to the public by the FCC since 1996. This is beyond absurd. People barely had dial-up internet at the time the last information was released by the FCC. It’s been 30 years and the technology has exponentially advanced and infiltrated our everyday lives, publicly and privately, with little regard for the harm it presents to all life big and small. Please do what is right and not what the industry, that lines your pockets, tells you and provide the updated information and studies. Sincerely, A very concerned parent.
I am submitting this comment as a resident of Paris, France, living near a site hosting multiple mobile phone base stations. My purpose is not to provide a scientific conclusion but to present information that may be relevant to the FCC's review of real-world RF exposure issues. In my residence, concerns have arisen regarding exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from nearby telecommunications antennas. Independent measurements commissioned by me reported significantly higher exposure levels than those previously identified through an official measurement process. French authorities, through the Agence Nationale des Fréquences (ANFR), informed me that an official measurement performed in my residence on 25 January 2024 resulted in a global exposure level of 4.29 V/m and concluded that the installation complied with the applicable French regulations. The ANFR stated that this value was below the 6 V/m threshold used at that time to identify an atypical exposure situation. However, subsequent measurements obtained independently reported substantially higher values, including measurements reaching approximately 30 V/m according to the documentation submitted to the French authorities. Because of this discrepancy between the official measurement and the subsequent measurements, I believe that additional attention should be given to: Real-world residential exposure conditions near wireless infrastructure; Variability of exposure levels over time; Measurement methodologies and their limitations; Long-term exposure assessment in occupied dwellings; Transparency and reproducibility of exposure measurements. For transparency, I am submitting both the independent measurement report and the response received from the ANFR. I respectfully request that the FCC consider situations where different measurement campaigns may produce significantly different results and evaluate whether additional research or monitoring could help improve public understanding of residential RF exposure. Thank you for considering this information.
I am a resident of Paris, France, and I would like to submit information that I believe may be relevant to the FCC's ongoing review of radiofrequency (RF) exposure issues. Attached is a measurement report documenting RF field measurements performed in my apartment, located approximately 79 to 90 meters from a building hosting multiple mobile phone base station antennas. According to the report, repeated measurements were conducted between October and December 2025 using a Narda SRM-3006 spectrum analyzer. The report records several RF field levels above 6 V/m and 9 V/m, with higher values observed during certain measurement sessions. The measurements were performed on multiple dates and in different rooms of the apartment, both with windows open and closed. The report also includes observations regarding exposure from several mobile network operators and contains technical measurement data and photographs of the environment. I respectfully request that the FCC carefully consider evidence relating to: Real-world exposure levels experienced by residents living near wireless infrastructure; Long-term exposure to RF emissions; The adequacy of current exposure assessment methods; The need for continued research concerning residential exposure scenarios. I am submitting this document in French because it reflects the original measurements and observations. An English summary can be provided if necessary. Thank you for considering this information as part of the public record.