My wife suffers severe brain fog and headaches whenever we go into town. We deal with a few businesses located proximate to a 5G tower and it ALWAYS affects her. When we only need to go to the other end of town, she fares much better. The public desperately needs industry and health agencies to reassess EMF exposure effects and focus on safeguards and changes necessary to ensure healthier outcomes.
I live within 100 meters of a cell tower in downtown Kalamazoo rand despite all attempts at stopping the installation of those massive towers in a residential area, was not allowed to even testify and be heard. I have no choice in that continual exposure or even a right to have those well-documented health concerns taken into consideration which are clearly real. I noticed this most when we had a breakdown of the power grid in Kalamazoo after a windstorm took down many large trees, transformers and power-lines in my area of the city. For several days everything was dark after sunset. The point I wish to make is that I suddenly slept better and the subtle degrees of continual stress that are everyday life in a city fell blessedly away revealing what we live with. Gone were the arguments among people and nervous states about small things that continually disturb us and we hardly know about. As a lifelong meditator I am trained to recognize such changes of states of mind and they are real. We should not have to live with this. What we have is the opposite of informed consent.
When exposed to wireless radiation I can feel: umbalanced, headache, nausea, dizziness, numbness, muscle spams, palpitation, and itchy skin. The itchiness can change into feeling skin burning, like it is being pierced by hot sharp needles . Extended exposure to wireless can bring exhaustion and heart palpitation. I am very concerned about the effects of widespread wireless people and nature exposure to this man made non native wireless radiation. As an example among many please see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300367?via%3Dihub I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Nonetheless the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court.
To whom it may concern: I have recurrent corneal tears. I recently bought a 17E iPhone. This phone very notably affects my eyes, especially the left eye, and even more especially when I am incapacitated with a debilitating, painful tear. The closer the phone gets to me, the more physical grief I feel in my eye, which then affects the other eye and the rest of my body. It’s a very real thing. I also get regular headaches and eye discomfort with normal use of my phone. I needed a new phone, but the 5G is seriously detrimental. This harmful energy must stop, especially around schools and homes. Sincerely, Karen Lummus.
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Please protect the health and wellbeing of our children.
The evidence of harm from wireless radiation has now grown massive. It has become the undeniable elephant in the room. In my own practice as a physician I have seen countless patients who reported a variety of illness symptoms when exposed to wireless radiation. Debra Davis, Magda Havas, Arthur Firstenberg, Martin Pall, Martin Blank, and Joel Moskowitz are just some of the researchers have extensively documented the harms of this technology and the thousands of research studies attesting to its harmfulness. Ignoring this research is completely irresponsible. Even if one disagrees with the research, or questions the methodology the LEAST a responsible regulator could do is to stop the spread of this technology until regulators have determined that the technology is WITHOUT QUESTION safe for human exposure. We are certainly a long way away from that conclusion, which is basic to the precautionary principle - and which should serve as guidance for all regulators. Please STOP the expansion of this technology, roll back its most dangerous applications, and insist on higher standards if you have any sense of right and wrong in your hearts. There is simply NO JUSTIFICATION for maintaining or expanding a technology which has so many already demonstrated harms, and many which are simply not properly researched. I urge you to not repeat the mistakes of COVID, where young people were exposed to the vaccine because reckless and irresponsible regulators were misled in approving the COVID vaccine for children by nonsensical guidelines like, “We’ll never know how harmful it is unless we approve it.” In no universe aligned with ethical principles can this guidance possibly be acceptable. Do your duty, and regulate dangerous technology as it ought to be regulated.
Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage Since exposures -- I have suffered migraine headaches, temporal arteritis, inflammation, and other maladies, which a reasonable person would believe, have causative factors, based on overexposure to the electromagnetic activity emitted near me, by cell phone and other em devices. Lynn Weed, New York 10002