All comment threads

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

I am responding to the FCC invitation to comment on the subject docket from the broadest range of commenters. As an interested party, I have researched the impacts of wireless radiation on humans and the environment extensively and it is now quite clear that RF radiation is harmful to us and all living things. It is devastating to some individuals – and they deserve to be heard. The FCC’s evaluation of the totality of available science has never been made available to the public. The same is true for the FDA. They claim it is prudent to address the totality of available science; however, they have not made their review of the ‘totality’ of available science available for public review and scrutiny. Herein lies the problem with any proclamation that the totality of available science has been reviewed. The American public deserves a full assessment of potential harm. Urgent attention is required to protect the population, environment, especially vulnerable children who depend upon government protections. Society is letting our children down in the most egregious fashion imaginable by forcing them to absorb radiation into their bodies and brains through forced deployment of wireless infrastructure throughout our country. In order to protect the public, an independent review of the totality of available science is critical. If the FCC believes the science is incomplete, even with the depth of scientific papers from the US and around the world that point to harm, then it is incumbent upon the FCC to exercise the Precautionary Principle at a very minimum to protect vulnerable children. Rapid expansion of wireless infrastructure that is potentially extremely harmful to our children and the population at large - must be addressed. Well documented scientific papers provide ample support to show the FCC adopted radiation limits do not protect the population. An excellent, well-supported paper is linked below. A review of the totality of available scientific evidence is vital to protect humans and the environment from harmful RF radiation. Reference: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://rdcu.be/4ngRtwSvrZYa

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

My ears have not stopped ringing since the smart meters were installed.

Dear Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Subject: Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Subject. I have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) and Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EHS). Radiofrequency (RF), and Wireless Radiation Exposuremagnify and compromise my Health and Safety. I am a Senior and Disabled. My Landline is my Lifeline. I presented Testimony and Research on the World EHS Day 2023 via Massachusetts for Safe Technology. Ms. Cece Doucette presented my Narrative as the ZOOM technology was a challenge for me. * I presented at the World EHS Day 2023 6.16.23 01:08:34: Virginia Rosen, RN by Cece Doucette AND. to: Dear Department of Public Utilities (DPU) and Kerri Phillips (At Mass.Gov), Subject: Public Comment: AMI Data Access and Related Proposals (DPU 26-20/21/22) I cannot be around any Internet, devices, or any such Toxic radiation. **I use a Landline, no text, no Caller ID, no microwave oven, no LED's. Please do all in your Personal and Collective power to safeguard my Landline for my Health and Safety. Thank you for your time, energy and consideration of this matter. Gratefully yours,

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.