Topics & supporting passages
  • Court remand & agency accountability: “The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals).”
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: “The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals).”

Topics matched to original text; attachment contents excluded. Classification details

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals). The FCC complaint to the same high court’s recent mandamus for a response was that it hadn’t had time. So, it apparently spent zero time on this task thus far, a thumb to its nose at the force of law. Now, as its passive desire to demonstrate effort on the grievously neglected court mandate, it asks the public to once again send it evidence from all those studies it certainly still possesses references for in the court documents. Environmental Health Trust, in the interim after the winning 2022 lawsuit, conveyed to the FCC another copious list of references showing further confirmation of many harms from RF radiation that is below the antiquated elevated strength limits of the FCC. All this new “request for information” is a non-convincing pinky promise that it will do something with this information, but what exactly is it?