Posted 2026-10-15#26110081586 · Permanent link ↗Topics & supporting passagesOther public filings: “Format tag; no document contents analyzed.”Topics matched to original text; attachment contents excluded. Classification detailsORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXTProtect wireless sufferersShare on XShare on FacebookShare optionsEdit your share textRF Safe · FCC Filing 26110081586 Van Excerpt from the filing: Protect wireless sufferers Topics: Other public filings Read the complete filing: https://safecellularphones.org/fcc-forum/comments/public-comment-filing-26110081586/X receives this full draft without shortening. Review it in the composer; the length you can publish depends on your account. The complete draft remains editable here. For Facebook, copy the text and paste it into your post.Copy full textCopy linkDevice share menuHow to submit your own official comment →DiscussionReader replies are separate from the official FCC submission. Reply publication follows the forum settings. Display names are not verified.View ThreadedFlat · oldest firstFlat · newest firstJoin the discussionCancel replyDisplay nameYour replyUp to 1,500 characters. Plain text only. Do not include private contact details.Leave this emptySend for approval
▤https://x.com/RosalitoEhs/status/1961682070473752975 Can also view my website here to view other linked r…Carl Smith II · #26110083451 · Other public filings2026-10-22Topics indexed
▤It's way past time that the FCC showed concern for the health of Americans over the profits of the corpor…Mary Stowe · #26110083420 · Other public filings2026-10-22Topics indexed
▤I have personally experienced negative health impacts from exposure to nnEMFs. https://www.americansforre…Anonymous · #26110083300 · Other public filings2026-10-22Topics indexed
▤I submitted the same content twice, first without my name and "signature" within the document itself and …Michele Dubow · #26110083298 · Other public filings2026-10-22Topics indexed