{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2860","body_sha256":"26006f749163f4b6ec03ca4a7d7659599eb006962cfa9ce4b770bda225d503c0","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"bsequently published, peer reviewed and replicated is the only ( repeat, only) valid input on this topic. A re"},{"id":"privacy","evidence":"ductive and naive.\n\nAlso, note that the privacy disclaimer states ‘do not submit personally identifiable information’,"}],"summary":"Argues that safety assessments should rely on qualified researchers and replicated evidence rather than public opinion, and criticizes inconsistent privacy instructions.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-15T03:51:16Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact topic evidence; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"c89752f7bcd2207de159ddbcb7d9e20f86444acf51adeb7bbe3a0dea1c1929c6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}