{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3884","name":"Anonymous Anonymous","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-14T04:00Z","body":"This radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't affect health negatively other than the implications of usual screen time. \n\nAlso, let's take our information from actual medical sources instead of a man who legitimately claimed he had a brain worm and is obviously trying to push his \"alternative science\" agenda. RFJ Jr is an absolute joke and a scourge that is adversely affecting actual physicians and scientists. ","source_hash":"858b88da61fac955b02cb388a9b43e4783154ae64a5e6d07597d4a3cb3da34d7","filing_type":"","proceedings":"","captured_at":"","source_name":"","number":"3884","withheld":false,"attachment_inventory":true,"capture_reviewed":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3884","slug":"public-comment-comment-3884","tags":[],"attachments":[],"attachment_names":[],"classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3884","body_sha256":"b647499ac0b0b7ed3740b174ead5d733ca017c74833bc287083ff6e56dda9bab","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"ime. \n\nAlso, let's take our information from actual medical sources instead of a man who legitimately claimed he had a brain worm an"},{"id":"other","evidence":"This radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't affect health negatively other than the implications of usual screen time. \n\nAlso, let's "}],"summary":"The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time effects and urges reliance on medical sources while criticizing HHS leadership.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"a30748fd299b9d6da38662744f284d1b11d25597b35986c8bbde5d8565840a6c","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"supplied_classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3884","body_sha256":"b647499ac0b0b7ed3740b174ead5d733ca017c74833bc287083ff6e56dda9bab","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"ime. \n\nAlso, let's take our information from actual medical sources instead of a man who legitimately claimed he had a brain worm an"},{"id":"other","evidence":"This radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't affect health negatively other than the implications of usual screen time. \n\nAlso, let's "}],"summary":"The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time effects and urges reliance on medical sources while criticizing HHS leadership.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"a30748fd299b9d6da38662744f284d1b11d25597b35986c8bbde5d8565840a6c","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"attachment_metadata":[],"mirror_fingerprint":"bd83e9e861a70184ccd1350adec1fc7b7dec15fd597bbfb61e96e55ab4675153","seo_modified":"2026-10-29T15:28:52Z","forum_topics":["research","other"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time …"}