{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167","name":"Jennifer LaPorta","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-20T04:00Z","body":"I have negative neurological health symptoms when I use my cell phone.  I recently used my cell phone a lot more during 6 weeks of travel. (my ethernet wired laptop was home).  \n\nA PubMed article dated July 15, 2020, titled “Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest” discusses obvious conflicts of interest on this subject. Excerpts from this paper are below: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7405337/#sec4\n\nIn addition, in 2023, the rats and monkeys experiments were explicitly discussed in the International Journal of\nEnvironmental Research and Public Health via a paper co-authored by 13 experts on behalf of the\nInternational Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF): These\nexperts include: Paul Héroux, Igor Belyaev, Kent Chamberlin, Suleyman Dasdag, Alvaro Augusto\nAlmeida De Salles, Claudio Enrique Fernandez Rodriguez, Lennart Hardell, Elizabeth Kelley, Kavindra\nKumar Kesari, Erica Mallery-Blythe, Ronald L. Melnick, Anthony B. Miller, and Joel M. Moskowitz.\nThe paper is titled “Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions”.\nhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/369836628_Cell_Phone_Radiation_Exposure_Limits_and_Eng\nineering_Solutions.  The authors discuss seven fundamental “Blind Spots” in the IEEE-ICNIRP evaluation of the biological effects of RFR.  Your MPE guidelines are severely outdated and inaccurate in using only thermal effects.  They MUST be updated to reflect today's world of households with multiple wireless sources and 24/7 exposure.  ","source_hash":"8e25ae3dad326ead091622123fc08213b87b2ada68a06a37d9f909226248eb48","filing_type":"","proceedings":"","captured_at":"","source_name":"","number":"6167","withheld":false,"attachment_inventory":true,"capture_reviewed":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167","slug":"health-experiences-comment-6167","tags":[],"attachments":["https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167/attachment_1.pdf"],"attachment_names":{"https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167/attachment_1.pdf":"Cell_Phone_Radiation_Exposure_Limits_and_Engineeri"},"classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167","body_sha256":"559be7ef74ecb3e724db71d543a2e1caed47e13426f5c25829d0fd1b6319d691","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"neurological","topics":[{"id":"neurological","evidence":"I have negative neurological health symptoms when I use my cell phone.  I recently used my cell phone a lot m"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"tion of the biological effects of RFR.  Your MPE guidelines are severely outdated and inaccurate in using only thermal effec"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ng 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest” discusses obvious conflicts of interest on this subject. Excerp"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"one a lot more during 6 weeks of travel. (my ethernet wired laptop was home).  \n\nA PubMed article dated July 15, 2020, titled “Heal"}],"summary":"Reports neurological symptoms during phone use, cites conflict-of-interest and standards critiques, and requests updated limits reflecting simultaneous long-term exposures.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"ffda42bef847aa30c6e6f620ab317bdec3123be2f7ab275c1b86285b1d133e98","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"supplied_classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167","body_sha256":"559be7ef74ecb3e724db71d543a2e1caed47e13426f5c25829d0fd1b6319d691","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"neurological","topics":[{"id":"neurological","evidence":"I have negative neurological health symptoms when I use my cell phone.  I recently used my cell phone a lot m"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"tion of the biological effects of RFR.  Your MPE guidelines are severely outdated and inaccurate in using only thermal effec"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ng 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest” discusses obvious conflicts of interest on this subject. Excerp"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"one a lot more during 6 weeks of travel. (my ethernet wired laptop was home).  \n\nA PubMed article dated July 15, 2020, titled “Heal"}],"summary":"Reports neurological symptoms during phone use, cites conflict-of-interest and standards critiques, and requests updated limits reflecting simultaneous long-term exposures.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"ffda42bef847aa30c6e6f620ab317bdec3123be2f7ab275c1b86285b1d133e98","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"attachment_metadata":{"https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167/attachment_1.pdf":{"title":"Cell_Phone_Radiation_Exposure_Limits_and_Engineeri","mime":"application/pdf","source":"https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6167/attachment_1.pdf","upstream_key":"1eb273b6f78ba7014b87336154f625df0338a903f6cff2667181d1f7fcdd2aec","key":"1eb273b6f78ba7014b87336154f625df0338a903f6cff2667181d1f7fcdd2aec"}},"mirror_fingerprint":"417243979be7eb4bf79e580862bc9c623af9725407cf66b20f5685f606edcfd3","seo_modified":"2026-10-29T15:28:52Z","forum_topics":["neurological","standards","research","optical"],"primary_topic":"neurological","forum_title":"Reports neurological symptoms during phone use, cites conflict-of-interest and standards critiques, and r…"}