{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2322","body_sha256":"c28698b5273568e73adc9a8b494de15a2585822c2ca1dc0f8e3100530fc993f1","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"sit established conclusions, start with reproducible research, systematic reviews, and qualified scientists. Asking the p"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"re can cause harm, which is exactly why measured exposure levels and established findings matter.\n\nDecades of research exist"}],"summary":"Criticizes the inquiry’s reliance on public anecdotes and calls for reproducible research, systematic reviews and qualified scientists to assess exposure and unresolved questions.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-14T13:55:48Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact evidence passages; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"4effe3c3a8ab4c57bc596061f80c6b5268cbddf382f6fb9f189a38afb19e18d0","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}