{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1419","body_sha256":"16bcecefd58a5eb8d85708f3e52a37011570f11a7b2c559c9ad3e45735bd296c","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"rough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to"},{"id":"research","evidence":"tion, that can only happen when studies from 3rd party testing publish the true results and ALL companies need to com"},{"id":"environment","evidence":" 6G and 10 G are proving to damage, insects, wildlife, and other environmental concerns, yet people are not "},{"id":"children","evidence":" concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. \n\nPlease prioritize research that refle"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"issue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. \n\nPl"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"ating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. \n\nPlease prioritize resea"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"e and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.\n•Recommend updated standards whe"}],"summary":"Requests independent exposure research and enforceable protections, emphasizing environmental impacts, vulnerable groups and chronic nonthermal effects.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-05T20:06:38Z","review_method":"Full published comment-body review; exact shared paragraphs read once and reused losslessly; distinct official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"ae6e0f90ced5d4fc4c160aa976380bc2039918221651c632b01c19edc13b8312","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}