{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2888","body_sha256":"c01ee5c2f2d49df169f45075b3e24067a08752d5524677f864b09c01edf3e3b6","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"d out if we are to set a more realistic Safe level of exposure for the general public and all those who work n"},{"id":"research","evidence":"s is mostly absent. \n\nA great deal more research into the neurological and neurophysiological response to th"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":". \n\nA great deal more research into the neurological and neurophysiological response to these EMF sources should"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"tal consequence of LED lighting is that insect reproduction near these lights is mostly absent. \n\nA great deal more res"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"or the general public and all those who work near EMF sources."}],"summary":"Argues that exposure limits are too high and requests research into neurological effects of 5G and LED lighting, including occupational and insect concerns.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-15T03:51:16Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact topic evidence; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"46f9ad05080cfeff6ded3e20bd1a84d10232acb2dba069cb0545c2814ed0c24e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}