{"id":"26110082362","name":"Diane Douglas","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-19","received":"2026-10-19","body":"I am an occupational therapist, a mother, and a small business owner. The health impacts from RF emissions from a \"smart\" electric meter installation on my office, along with daily cellphone use, and a new \"super powerful\" router for my office .... cumulated in an 180 degree change in my life's quality in 2018. Unregulated, unmonitored standards are killing our kids and our society. There are well researched results of the health impact of wireless devices on cellular health. Wireless frequencies have been the standard of which I now navigate my life. Unfortunately, this country that is denying the very real impact of wireless frequency bands is destroying the very base of which it depends upon for future success. FCC’s invitation claims its 1996 wireless radiation exposure limits stem from “gold-standard research” from organizations “including the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the American National Standards Institute and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), internationally recognized standard-setting organizations.” Two other such recognized groups include the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), which shared membership by Dr. James Lin, who concluded: “... RF exposure limits make allowances only to worry about heat with RF radiation. These limits are devised for restricting short-term heating by RF radiation and aim to prevent increased tissue temperatures. Thus, they are not applicable to long-term exposure at low levels. Instead of advances in science, they are predicated on assumptions using outdated exposure metrics, thus their ability to protect children, workers, and the public from exposure to the RF radiation or people with sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices and systems. Furthermore, the limits are based on outdated information and circumvent important animal data. These issues are even more relevant in the case of millimeter-wave radiation from 5G mobile communications for which there are no adequate health effects studies in the published literature. Finally, the guidelines do not adequately address conclusions from scientific organizations, such as the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Thus, many of the recommended limits are questionable from the standpoint of scientific justification for the safety and public health protection.” Society needs to know the impact of wireless devices and communications are on cellular health. Ignoring sound historical and current research and discounting debilitating impacts no longer is accepted. REAL integration of the science and regulations need to occur.","source_hash":"663075a16a033ca01954e23d673e692d834eab35b9942d857a27984ddf335f21","filing_type":"COMMENT","proceedings":"ET 13-84","captured_at":"2026-10-23T01:25:29.351Z","source_name":"Diane Douglas","number":"26110082362","withheld":false,"attachment_inventory":true,"capture_reviewed":false,"source":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082362","slug":"cancer-filing-26110082362","tags":[],"attachments":[],"attachment_names":[],"classification":{"id":"26110082362","body_sha256":"4e94746becc486af8b47bbc6da65b40bd09ecbcbfddae48f6aa9d75fa9f6d84c","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"Finally, the guidelines do not adequately address conclusions from scientific organizations, such as the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"Unregulated, unmonitored standards are killing our kids and our society."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"These issues are even more relevant in the case of millimeter-wave radiation from 5G mobile communications for which there are no adequate health effects studies in the published literature."},{"id":"wifi-devices","evidence":"The health impacts from RF emissions from a \"smart\" electric meter installation on my office, along with daily cellphone use, and a new \"super powerful\" router for my office ...."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"FCC’s invitation claims its 1996 wireless radiation exposure limits stem from “gold-standard research” from organizations “including the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the American National Standards Institute and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), internationally recognized standard-setting organizations.” Two other such recognized groups include the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), which shared membership by Dr."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"Ignoring sound historical and current research and discounting debilitating impacts no longer is accepted."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"There are well researched results of the health impact of wireless devices on cellular health."}],"summary":"","method":"Supplied topics validated against current body hash and exact passages","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."},"supplied_classification":{"id":"26110082362","body_sha256":"4e94746becc486af8b47bbc6da65b40bd09ecbcbfddae48f6aa9d75fa9f6d84c","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"Finally, the guidelines do not adequately address conclusions from scientific organizations, such as the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"Unregulated, unmonitored standards are killing our kids and our society."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"These issues are even more relevant in the case of millimeter-wave radiation from 5G mobile communications for which there are no adequate health effects studies in the published literature."},{"id":"wifi-devices","evidence":"The health impacts from RF emissions from a \"smart\" electric meter installation on my office, along with daily cellphone use, and a new \"super powerful\" router for my office ...."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"FCC’s invitation claims its 1996 wireless radiation exposure limits stem from “gold-standard research” from organizations “including the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the American National Standards Institute and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), internationally recognized standard-setting organizations.” Two other such recognized groups include the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), which shared membership by Dr."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"Ignoring sound historical and current research and discounting debilitating impacts no longer is accepted."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"There are well researched results of the health impact of wireless devices on cellular health."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."},"mirror_fingerprint":"f514c9a6d2d57846933c5b23f59a451908090dbfe72213584176c35525bb6412","seo_modified":"2026-10-29T15:50:59Z","forum_topics":["cancer","children-schools","towers-antennas","wifi-devices","standards-testing","remand-accountability","research-requests"],"primary_topic":"cancer","forum_title":"I am an occupational therapist, a mother, and a small business owner. The health impacts from RF emission…"}